
Of the 20 leaders at the table during the G20 Summit, only two----President Cristina Kirchner of Argentina and Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany are women. Although, President Obama and other world leaders may have deep respect for women’s rights and issues that affect families, the question remains, will they convey the same perspective that a room full of women would? Although strides have been made in many countries to bring gender equality to elected leadership (In 2008, Women were elected to fill 45/80 Seats (56.3%) in the Rwanda lower house----far exceeding the 30% national quota for women’s representation in the National Parliament), it takes much effort to get world leaders to take issues of women’s rights and basic human rights seriously.
Even though there are organizations like the U.N. Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), the Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and the U.N. Division for the Advancement of Women, women continue to be exploited for political gain, as exemplified in the recent decision of Afghan President, Hamid Karzai, to sign a law that essentially legalizes rape in marriage; the most disconcerting clause in the bill states that “women cannot refuse to have sex with their husbands, and can only seek work, education or visit the doctor with their husbands' permission.” Although the UN and even the US Secretary of State Clinton has stated that this action is a human rights violation and that "This [women’s rights] is an area of absolute concern for the United States…Women's rights are a central part of the foreign policy of the Obama administration,” there is obviously much work to be done if we are to completely obliterate such wide sweeping and unprecedented actions against women. "Rhetoric with no teeth will shamefully perpetuate slow progress in ending gender-based violence and inequalities (Taina Bien-Aim, Executive Director of the New York-based Equality Now states)."

If Susan E. Rice's (the new American ambassador to the United Nations) recent support of moving the United States to join the United Nations' Human Rights Council is any indicator of America’s future support of international treaties like CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women), we may be headed in the right direction. Unfortunately, until we breach that point, it will be the burden of women who are in privileged positions to put pressure on International leaders to support the wives, mothers and “women that support them”. That is, until we are equally represented at the table of global power.
•The Straight Facts on Women in Poverty: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/10/women_poverty.html
•International Population Center: http://www.unfpa.org/intercenter/beijing/intro.htm
•Pressure on Hamid Karzai to Scrap Afghan Women’s :aw: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/01/afghanistan-womens-rights-hamid-karzai
•Development: Global Coalition Backs New U.N. Gender Body: http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=46320
•Global Database of Quotas for Women: http://www.quotaproject.org/displayCountry.cfm?CountryCode=RW
•U.N. Flunking on Gender Empowerment: http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=45903
•Q&A: Time Has Come for a New U.N. Women’s Agency: http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=45955
•In Reversal, U.S. Seeks Election to U.N. Human Rights Council: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/world/01nations.html?_r=2
•G20 Must Bailout Women’s Hardships: http://southasia.oneworld.net/opinioncomment/g-20-must-bailout-women2019s-hardships